Controlling Dx Type for ICD10 codes: Difference between revisions

From CCMDB Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
mNo edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{CCMDB Data Integrity Checks| one of: needs review}}
Many of the items on the [[ICD10 Diagnosis List]] are not suitable as certain [[Dx Type]]s.
Many of the items on the [[ICD10 Diagnosis List]] are not suitable as certain [[Dx Type]]s.
   
   

Revision as of 19:57, 2018 August 6

Template:CCMDB Data Integrity Checks

Many of the items on the ICD10 Diagnosis List are not suitable as certain Dx Types.

Examples:

We would like a way to detect when such inconsistencies happen.

Proposed Solution 1

  • Add three columns to the s_ICD10 table:
    • como_not_allowed
    • admit_not_allowed
    • acquired_not_allowed
      • Template:Discussion it might be possible to combine the admit and acquired columns; can someone think of a dx that would only be allowed in one of them, or prohibited in one of them?
  • populate the columns
    • default answers: NO in comorbid and YES in Admit, Acquired
    • Template:Discussion there are 1814 ICD10 codes on our list. Who would do this?
  • put cross checks into CCMDB.mdb to prevent bad entries

why do this change outside the wiki?

The change will require editing every single record in the ICD10 Diagnosis List, so doing it on the wiki would be time-prohibitive. If we do it externally the new fields would be imported into the wiki, which would then again be the master repository for this. We will use a tool like AutoWikiBrowser] or similar to get the changes integrated into pages.

Should we do this?

Template:Discussion Is this worth the effort? It would take someone not insignificant time.

Template:Discussion Is that a reasonable solution?

If we do this, should we do more?

Related Articles

Related articles: