HSC Virtual Ward

From CCMDB Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

The HSC Virtual Ward is an internal medicine service where hospital physicians follow patients who are sent home with special supports.

For now this is just a placeholder / link anchor for this, decisions around collection are not 100% clear.

Even if we don't collect the actual records, we need to decide how we will code patients who come from or go there:

Do we consider these inpatients?

Discussed at the Steering Committee meeting 2025-07-08; my notes say the consensus was that these are not in-patients. I searched today to find out how the rest of the system will collect these, and it appears the do consider these in-patients:

How we consider these has a lot of implications:

  • indicators
  • would we consider the virtual ward as an Pre-admit Inpatient Institution
    • this field is part of risk estimation, since patients who are previously inpatients have a higher risk for bad outcomes
    • hospital administrators use this field to find out from which sites patients are coming to their sites
  • reports
  • other
    • We will need to decide if things like how to group a transfer to virtual ward from the perspective of where a patient was sent geographically; for "home" we have a postal code, for specific site dispo we have a facet table that provides an RHA, etc. A lot of these are deeply buried assumptions in our reports - we have a good listing of what fields are used, but the structured data in our documentation was not set up to track at this level.
  • if we don't code them as inpatients, will this affect how our numbers compare to other data sources used by our data users?


Do we want to re-consider the decision to not collect these?

Recommendation

  • we should immediately break "HSC Virtual Ward" out as a specific entry in our s_dispo table and permit collection as Previous Location and Dispo
    • this is relatively quick to do, but we will likely encounter curve balls, such as collectors asking for instructions for unexpected scenarios, or Data Integrity Checks triggering because this doesn't fit into historical assumptions; we would need to know how to get answers quickly when that happens, and we would need direction on how to validate any changed assumptions
  • as soon as possible, but definitely before the next quarterly report, we need to decide whether to treat these as inpatients
  • if yes need to collect patients coming from virtual ward in Pre-admit Inpatient Institution
  • Julie will need direction which of the indicators and reports should include these and how

Log

  • 2025-11-07 - additional email to KM, need to get this answer out
  • 2025-10-30 - additional questions re. implications of inpatient status; emailed Kym to find out if we should include Nick on that question, she gave an initial answer, I responded back, it trailed out
  • 2025-10-23 - initial question in Dispo field re how to code discharge to this location
  • 2025-09-23 - initial records showed up in Cognos data import. We don't collect these, but added the following as required for so we added
  • 2025-07-08 CCMDB Monthly meeting - discussed that these are not in-patients

Related articles

Related articles: