Check pre acute consistent: Difference between revisions

From CCMDB Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
← Older edit
mNo edit summary
No edit summary
 
(30 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Data Integrity Check
{{Data Integrity Check
| DIC_summary =  
|DIC_summary=consistency of Pre acute living situation;  Dispo;  [[Postal Code]] and [[Previous Location]]
| DIC_related_concepts =  
|DIC_related_concepts=Pre acute living situation;  Dispo;  Postal Code; Previous Location; Province field
| DIC_firmness = hard check (not allowed) or soft check  
|DIC_firmness=soft check
| DIC_timing =
|DIC_timing=complete
| DIC_app = CCMDB.mdb
|DIC_coding=query '''check pre acute consistent'''
| DIC_coding = query '''check pre acute consistent'''  
|DIC_status=declined
| DIC_status = needs review
|DIC_app=CCMDB.accdb
| DIC_implementation_date =  
|DIC_backlogged=No
}}
}}
Discussed with Julie; she used to use this as part of Overstay, but that project is no longer so we don't need this.


{{Discuss | JALT
* Julie found data discrepancies and asked if we could review doing cross checks at least on records with the same [[Visit Admit DtTm]] for the following fields:
** [[Pre acute living situation]]
** [[Province field]]
** [[Postal Code]]
* We reviewed a broader cross check proposal (link below) in some detail in a version available in the history of this page], so if we consider adding this we should confirm that none of those apply to any checks. Or we can ignore and just implement as soft-checks. Thoughts? [[User:Ttenbergen|Ttenbergen]] 12:28, 17 December 2025 (CST)
}}
[https://ccmdb.kuality.ca/index.php?title=Check_pre_acute_consistent&oldid=138792  version with discussion]


== Related articles ==
{{Related Articles}}


I found cases where the pre-living situation for direct admits are not consistent with previous location and/or dispo.  I want the DC to be aware that the pre-living situation has relationship with the previous location or dispo specifically for PCH cases. 
[[Category:Admit/Discharge]]
 
[[Category:Registry Data]]
Example pre-living situation = assisted living;    previous location = Winnipeg PCH
[[Category:Postal Codes]]
              pre-living situation = supportive home;  previous location = St Amant
[[Category:Pre-acute living situation]]
 
I rely on the combination of  pre-living situation, previous location, postal code and  dispo fields to identified new or already  PCH resident prior to admission.  Data collectors must understand that assisted living and supportive home are not PCH and must be entered as simply HOME as confirmed  by Dr Roberts .
 
 
 
[[Pre acute living situation field]]
[[Dispo_field]]
[[Previous_Location_field]]
 
{{Discuss | who=Tina | question= need analyze further. }}

Latest revision as of 13:30, 17 December 2025

Data Integrity Checks
Summary: consistency of Pre acute living situation; Dispo; Postal Code and Previous Location
Related: Pre acute living situation, Dispo, Postal Code, Previous Location, Province field
Firmness: soft check
Timing: complete
App: CCMDB.accdb
Coding: query check pre acute consistent
Uses L Problem table: not relevant for this app
Status: declined
Implementation Date: not entered
Backlogged: No
  • Cargo


  • SMW


  • Categories:  
  • form:

Discussed with Julie; she used to use this as part of Overstay, but that project is no longer so we don't need this. 

JALT
  • Julie found data discrepancies and asked if we could review doing cross checks at least on records with the same Visit Admit DtTm for the following fields:
  • We reviewed a broader cross check proposal (link below) in some detail in a version available in the history of this page], so if we consider adding this we should confirm that none of those apply to any checks. Or we can ignore and just implement as soft-checks. Thoughts? Ttenbergen 12:28, 17 December 2025 (CST)
  • SMW


  • Cargo


  • Categories

version with discussion

Related articles

Related articles:
Retrieved from "https://ccmdb.kuality.ca/index.php?title=Check_pre_acute_consistent&oldid=168174"