Check pre acute consistent: Difference between revisions
Ttenbergen (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
Ttenbergen (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| (30 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Data Integrity Check | {{Data Integrity Check | ||
| DIC_summary = | |DIC_summary=consistency of Pre acute living situation; Dispo; [[Postal Code]] and [[Previous Location]] | ||
| DIC_related_concepts = | |DIC_related_concepts=Pre acute living situation; Dispo; Postal Code; Previous Location; Province field | ||
| DIC_firmness = | |DIC_firmness=soft check | ||
| DIC_timing = | |DIC_timing=complete | ||
|DIC_coding=query '''check pre acute consistent''' | |||
| DIC_coding = query '''check pre acute consistent''' | |DIC_status=declined | ||
| DIC_status = | |DIC_app=CCMDB.accdb | ||
| | |DIC_backlogged=No | ||
}} | }} | ||
Discussed with Julie; she used to use this as part of Overstay, but that project is no longer so we don't need this. | |||
{{Discuss | JALT | |||
* Julie found data discrepancies and asked if we could review doing cross checks at least on records with the same [[Visit Admit DtTm]] for the following fields: | |||
** [[Pre acute living situation]] | |||
** [[Province field]] | |||
** [[Postal Code]] | |||
* We reviewed a broader cross check proposal (link below) in some detail in a version available in the history of this page], so if we consider adding this we should confirm that none of those apply to any checks. Or we can ignore and just implement as soft-checks. Thoughts? [[User:Ttenbergen|Ttenbergen]] 12:28, 17 December 2025 (CST) | |||
}} | |||
[https://ccmdb.kuality.ca/index.php?title=Check_pre_acute_consistent&oldid=138792 version with discussion] | |||
== Related articles == | |||
{{Related Articles}} | |||
[[Category:Admit/Discharge]] | |||
[[Category:Registry Data]] | |||
[[Category:Postal Codes]] | |||
[[Category:Pre-acute living situation]] | |||
[[ | |||
[[ | |||
[[ | |||