Collection location documentation: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 13:36, 2022 February 9

We document collection locations using the Template:Collection Location. They can all be viewed on Site and Location table. However, much of that is from before PatientFollow Project and no longer representative

there are no more designated collectors
we may well have added or removed units and not update wiki, with all the dynamics during COVID

How should we update our collection location documentation? Who is the audience for it now?

	wiki housekeeping How should we now keep track of the ward info on the wiki? Do we actually need to? Or is it sufficient to tell the number of beds at e.g. Grace Medicine? what links to site/locations page is likely an indicator of the audience for this info, but Julie may well link from reports as well. Depending how we want to use this going forward, a static page might be an option, but then we can no longer link to individual locations. If we keep separate locations, we need to make sure we keep them updated. I have put this on Julie's question list as well, and emailed Julie and Lisa about it. Ttenbergen 16:07, 2021 July 14 (CDT)	added: 2020-10-15 action: 2021-09-01

	How should we now keep track of the ward/unit info on the wiki? More questions on page.Ttenbergen 16:07, 2021 July 14 (CDT) Perhaps this can also be included in the META data you will set up showing the start and end dates and the bed size. --JMojica 14:32, 2022 February 7 (CST) Agreed! This is also why I think where possible we should shift the s_dispo contents to the same name so the same meta table can supply both. I want to discuss how to best encode this with you, hopefully tomorrow at out wiki meeting. Ttenbergen 15:14, 2022 February 8 (CST) I need the s_dispo because I am using the other columns as various categories of the detailed numeric locations name and I do not want to drop it for now. I have yet to see the meta data table you are talking about to decide. Sorry didn't say that clearly. Don't mean to eliminate s_dispo table at this time, just want to make sure we use same location name as in Boarding Loc where applicable, so we can store the metadata all in one table. Ttenbergen 13:36, 2022 February 9 (CST)

Template:Collection Location
- fields "Collection Service Type Legacy" and "Collection Workload Split" and "Collection Service Type" and "Collection Collector" are becoming meaningless, what is the best way to clean that up? This whole template needs to move to Cargo instead of SMW. Ttenbergen 17:39, 2020 October 15 (CDT)
Site and Location table
- will need to be updated for appropriate fields
The following have auto-listings based on our location pages:
- Grace Medicine Collection Guide, HSC Medicine Collection Guide, STB Medicine Collection Guide

@@ Line 19: / Line 19: @@
 *** Agreed! This is also why I think where possible we should shift the s_dispo contents to the same name so the same meta table can supply both. I want to discuss how to best encode this with you, hopefully tomorrow at out wiki meeting. [[User:Ttenbergen|Ttenbergen]] 15:14, 2022 February 8 (CST)
 **** I need the s_dispo because I am using the other columns as various categories of  the detailed numeric locations name and I do not want to drop it for now.  I have yet to see the meta data table you are talking about to decide.
+***** Sorry didn't say that clearly. Don't mean to eliminate [[s_dispo table]] at this time, just want to make sure we use same location name as in [[Boarding Loc]] where applicable, so we can store the metadata all in one table. [[User:Ttenbergen|Ttenbergen]] 13:36, 2022 February 9 (CST)
 }}