Check pre acute consistent: Difference between revisions

From CCMDB Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
mNo edit summary
mNo edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Data Integrity Check
{{Data Integrity Check
| DIC_summary = consistency of [[Pre acute living situation field]], [[Dispo]], [[Postal Code]] and [[Previous Location]]
| DIC_summary = consistency of [[Pre acute living situation]], [[Dispo]], [[Postal Code]] and [[Previous Location]]
| DIC_related_concepts = [[Pre acute living situation field]], [[Dispo]], [[Postal Code)]], [[Previous_Location_field]]
| DIC_related_concepts = [[Pre acute living situation]], [[Dispo]], [[Postal Code]], [[Previous Location]]
| DIC_firmness = soft check  
| DIC_firmness = soft check  
| DIC_timing = complete
| DIC_timing = complete
Line 11: Line 11:


The collector will receive an escapable warning if:  
The collector will receive an escapable warning if:  
*  
* {{Discussion}} If what?
{{Discuss | who=Tina | question= need analyze further. }}
{{Discuss | who=Tina | question= need analyze further. }}


{{Discussion}} There was a previous attempt to address some of this in [[Care levels in the community]]; this page and it need to be consistent, and consistently linked from the relevant field definitions. If we can get it short enough we might make a template to apply the instructions to each of the field pages.
{{Discussion}} There are instructions relating to some of the pages in [[:Category:Awaiting/delayed transfer]], consistency with this page needs to be confirmed.
{{Discussion}} How does [[Chronic Health Facility]] fit into this?


=== Background ===
=== Background ===
Line 22: Line 27:
* [[pre acute living situation]] = supportive home;  [[Previous Location]] = St Amant  
* [[pre acute living situation]] = supportive home;  [[Previous Location]] = St Amant  


I rely on the combination of [[pre acute living situation]], [[Previous Location]], [[Postal Code)]] and [[Dispo]] fields '''to identified new or already PCH residents''' prior to admission. Data collectors must understand that '''[[Assisted Living]] and [[Supportive Housing]] are not [[PCH]] and must be entered as simply HOME''' as confirmed by Dr Roberts .  
I rely on the combination of [[pre acute living situation]], [[Previous Location]], [[Postal Code]] and [[Dispo]] fields '''to identified new or already PCH residents''' prior to admission. Data collectors must understand that '''[[Assisted Living]] and [[Supportive Housing]] are not [[PCH]] and must be entered as simply HOME''' as confirmed by Dr Roberts.


== Related articles ==
== Related articles ==

Revision as of 20:20, 15 October 2018

Data Integrity Checks
Summary: consistency of Pre acute living situation, Dispo, Postal Code and Previous Location
Related: [[Pre acute living situation, Dispo, Postal Code, Previous Location]]
Firmness: soft check
Timing: complete
App: CCMDB.mdb
Coding: query check pre acute consistent
Uses L Problem table: not relevant for this app
Status: needs review
Implementation Date:
Backlogged: true
  • Cargo


  • SMW
"CCMDB.mdb" is not in the list (SAP, not entered, Centralized data front end.accdb, DSM Labs Consistency check.accdb, CCMDB.accdb, TISS28.accdb) of allowed values for the "DICApp" property. Property "DICRelatedConcepts" (as page type) with input value "Pre acute living situation]], Dispo, Postal Code, [[Previous Location" contains invalid characters or is incomplete and therefore can cause unexpected results during a query or annotation process.
  • Categories:  
  • form:

The collector will receive an escapable warning if:

need analyze further.

  • SMW


  • Cargo


  • Categories

Template:Discussion There was a previous attempt to address some of this in Care levels in the community; this page and it need to be consistent, and consistently linked from the relevant field definitions. If we can get it short enough we might make a template to apply the instructions to each of the field pages.

Template:Discussion There are instructions relating to some of the pages in Category:Awaiting/delayed transfer, consistency with this page needs to be confirmed.

Template:Discussion How does Chronic Health Facility fit into this?

Background

Julie found cases where the pre acute living situation for direct admits are not consistent with Previous Location and/or Dispo. We want the DC to be aware that the pre acute living situation has a relationship with the Previous Location or Dispospecifically for PCH cases.

Examples:

I rely on the combination of pre acute living situation, Previous Location, Postal Code and Dispo fields to identified new or already PCH residents prior to admission. Data collectors must understand that Assisted Living and Supportive Housing are not PCH and must be entered as simply HOME as confirmed by Dr Roberts.

Related articles

Related articles: