2020-03 HSC COVID unit transition: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
* '''Friday April 3''' - D4 Suspect patients moved to D2 Covid Suspect ward (D4-C is now the COVID positive ward) | * '''Friday April 3''' - D4 Suspect patients moved to D2 Covid Suspect ward (D4-C is now the COVID positive ward) | ||
* '''Tuesday April 7'''- B2B moved to WRS2 | * '''Tuesday April 7'''- B2B moved to WRS2 | ||
{{Discuss| is this the same B2 which was occupied by H4H in April 14? --[[User:JMojica|JMojica]] 14:10, 2020 April 22 (CDT)}} | |||
* '''Tuesday April 14'''- H4H moved to B2 | * '''Tuesday April 14'''- H4H moved to B2 | ||
* | * |
Revision as of 14:10, 22 April 2020
This page is about the March transition of collection units at HSC to accommodate the new COVID unit. See 2020-04 HSC COVID unit transition about further transitions in April.
Background
- Thursday March 19.20 – patients in HSC_D5_Pre_COVID will be moving to HSC_WRS3 (Level 3 of 735 Notre Dame Ave. old womens Hosp)
- Friday March 20.20 – patients in HSC_D4_pre_COVID will be moving to HSC D5
- Friday March 20.20 - D4 will be the new COVID-19 ward (HSC_D4_COVID ?)
- Wednesday April 1- H4 patients moved to HSC D4 as suspect COVID cases (H4 closed for terminal clean)
![]() |
Just to clarify the patient flow - all H4 patients were moved to HSC_D4_C and were all considered as covid suspects. and they are the ones who were now labeled as D4 suspects who later move to D2_C in Apr 3. the ones left at D4_C are all COVID+. H4 is vacant from April 1 to present - not been utilized. are these correct? --JMojica 14:03, 2020 April 22 (CDT) |
- Friday April 3 - D4 Suspect patients moved to D2 Covid Suspect ward (D4-C is now the COVID positive ward)
- Tuesday April 7- B2B moved to WRS2
![]() |
is this the same B2 which was occupied by H4H in April 14? --JMojica 14:10, 2020 April 22 (CDT) |
- Tuesday April 14- H4H moved to B2
HSC_D4_COVID
See HSC_D4_COVID for how we will collect the new ward.
Temporary naming
- changed names of the following in s_dispo table because the longer version was breaking sending:
![]() |
|
How will we identify these patients in EPR
EPR reports should work for the new locations as usual.
Transition plan
Due to the original transition plan duplicate records were created:
- one with the the original, pre-covid location (only renamed), and negative Pat_ID
- one with the future location, and negative Pat_ID
The plan was chagned as follows.
collector instructions
- delete the duplicate record with the positive Pat_ID, and keep the one with the negative Pat_ID
- change the Service/Location of the record to the new location (ie to HSC_WRS3 resp HSC_D5 )
- enter the actual location as part of Boarding Loc:
- for patients who had no location borrowing during transition:
- change the "no borrow" line to "HSC_D5_P", resp "HSC_D4_P"
- add a line for "HSC - Home medicine ward" with the time that the patient was actually moved
- if there were patients who actually were in a borrow location during the transition, let's talk about how we would enter those
- for patients who had no location borrowing during transition:
data processor instructions
The change of Service/Location will cause Orphans in Centralized data.mdb. Query COV_Pat_ID_matcher should help with cleanup. You may need to change the parameters H4/H5 to make it work for the respective laptop.
original plan, keep until fully backed out, but THIS IS NOT HOW WE WILL DO IT |
Reporting
Med reporting is by ward and combined. service location D5 before March 19 and WRS3N can be together.
Cross checks
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Related articles
Related articles: |