Attribution of infections: Difference between revisions

From CCMDB Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
m (Testing complete)
 
(18 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
There will always be a delay between an actual infection and the time at which the infection  is confirmed by the lab, or manifests so it can be determined without lab clarification (for diagnoses where we allow that.  
 
== Additional info ==
*Some of our reports "attribute" infections to units on which they happen if they are an [[Acquired Diagnosis]].


== Diagnoses with specific attribution rules ==
== Diagnoses with specific attribution rules ==
Line 7: Line 9:
* [[Iatrogenic, infection, urinary catheter]]
* [[Iatrogenic, infection, urinary catheter]]
* [[Template:ICD10 Guideline Iatrogenic]] deals with attribution of surgical infections
* [[Template:ICD10 Guideline Iatrogenic]] deals with attribution of surgical infections
{{Discuss |
* [[Nosocomial infection, NOS]]
* there may be others dx right now that my search for 48 did not find because maybe they use a 12 hr or 17 hour... rule. Collectors, can you think of any? Ttenbergen 15:38, 2020 March 25 (CDT)
* [[Template:ICD10 Guideline Como vs Admit]] - also deals with this
*[[Nosocomial infection, NOS]]? --[[User:Jvelasco|Jvelasco]] 14:45, 2020 June 12 (CDT) }}


== Attribution for all other infections ==
== Attribution for all other infections ==
{{DiscussTask |
* There is usually a delay between the start of an actual infection and the time at which the infection is confirmed by the lab, or manifests so it can be determined without lab clarification (for diagnoses where we allow that).
* What is the attribution rule for our program on MRSA colonization? For example if a patient comes from SOGH ICU to the Concordia and tests positive for MRSA in less than 24 hours I would attribute this colonization to the SOGH not the Concordia. Is that correct?
**But except for the infections listed above which have specific attribution rules, we designate the START/ONSET of an infection as:
** If we will have such a rule at all, could it be one that applies to infections in general and would therefore live in [[Template: ICD10 Guideline Infection]]. Also, we would want to make sure that "attribution" as a concept doesn't get muddled - if we search for that there are several hits, and we use other terms like "gets credit" elsewhere I believe. And in [[Lab and culture reports]]...  
**When it is first noticed clinically, or was first identified by the lab -- whichever happens '''FIRST'''
*** Allan confirmed that all the attributions should be the same and can be moved into that infection template. Ttenbergen 14:09, 2018 October 29 (CDT)
* A chronic-type infection (e.g. TB) which is first discovered in hospital BUT presumably was actually present on admission is governed by the rules of [[Template:ICD10 Guideline Como vs Admit]] -- i.e. coded as an [[Admit Diagnosis]].
**** This will mean that I pull the 48hr rule out of the following and instead put it into [[Template:ICD10 Guideline Infection]] that is applied to all infections, and/or [[Infections in ICD10]] which is referenced by the template:
**But rarely, a person can acquire such a chronic-type infection in hospital, and if THAT is thought to have happened, then code it as an [[Acquired Diagnosis]].
*For an acute-type infection (e.g. bacterial cellulitis) first identified '''after''' admission (the start of the current [[PatientFollow Project]] profile) to choose [[Admit Diagnosis]] vs. [[Comorbid Diagnosis]], you should try to figure out whether it was actually present at admission or actually began after admission. 
**Typically there will be at least a guess by the team about this.  If not, then you can default to the guideline that if it was first discovered '''within the first 48 hrs after admission''' to code it as an [[Admit Diagnosis]], and if discovered >48 hrs after admission to code it as as an [[Acquired Diagnosis]].


Does anyone think making this one rule for all will be a problem?
== Attribution doesn't apply to colonization ==
}}
See [[Colonized with organism (not infected)#Colonizations are not attributed to any units]]
{{Discuss | who = Julie | question = * Julie, the above question specifically affects some projects you work with as well - do you think unifying this rule will be a problem for any of them?
* if there are specific rules already in place (e.g. VAP, CLI, etc.) we should follow them. Those which don't have perhaps those are the ones we can unify. --[[User:JMojica|JMojica]] 14:51, 2020 March 20 (CDT) }}


== Related articles ==  
== Related articles ==  

Latest revision as of 12:14, 2023 July 5

Additional info

  • Some of our reports "attribute" infections to units on which they happen if they are an Acquired Diagnosis.

Diagnoses with specific attribution rules

We have specific attribution rules as documented in their pages for the following diagnoses:

Attribution for all other infections

  • There is usually a delay between the start of an actual infection and the time at which the infection is confirmed by the lab, or manifests so it can be determined without lab clarification (for diagnoses where we allow that).
    • But except for the infections listed above which have specific attribution rules, we designate the START/ONSET of an infection as:
    • When it is first noticed clinically, or was first identified by the lab -- whichever happens FIRST
  • A chronic-type infection (e.g. TB) which is first discovered in hospital BUT presumably was actually present on admission is governed by the rules of Template:ICD10 Guideline Como vs Admit -- i.e. coded as an Admit Diagnosis.
    • But rarely, a person can acquire such a chronic-type infection in hospital, and if THAT is thought to have happened, then code it as an Acquired Diagnosis.
  • For an acute-type infection (e.g. bacterial cellulitis) first identified after admission (the start of the current PatientFollow Project profile) to choose Admit Diagnosis vs. Comorbid Diagnosis, you should try to figure out whether it was actually present at admission or actually began after admission.
    • Typically there will be at least a guess by the team about this. If not, then you can default to the guideline that if it was first discovered within the first 48 hrs after admission to code it as an Admit Diagnosis, and if discovered >48 hrs after admission to code it as as an Acquired Diagnosis.

Attribution doesn't apply to colonization

See Colonized with organism (not infected)#Colonizations are not attributed to any units

Related articles

Related articles: