Attribution of infections: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Ttenbergen (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
Ttenbergen (talk | contribs) m (Discussed with Trish and should go to task) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Broken out from [[Resistance to antimicrobials, methicillin (anti-staph penicillins)]] | Broken out from [[Resistance to antimicrobials, methicillin (anti-staph penicillins)]] | ||
{{ | {{DiscussTask | | ||
* What is the attribution rule for our program on MRSA colonization? For example if a patient comes from SOGH ICU to the Concordia and tests positive for MRSA in less than 24 hours I would attribute this colonization to the SOGH not the Concordia. Is that correct? | * What is the attribution rule for our program on MRSA colonization? For example if a patient comes from SOGH ICU to the Concordia and tests positive for MRSA in less than 24 hours I would attribute this colonization to the SOGH not the Concordia. Is that correct? | ||
** If we will have such a rule at all, could it be one that applies to infections in general and would therefore live in [[Template: ICD10 Guideline Infection]]. Also, we would want to make sure that "attribution" as a concept doesn't get muddled - if we search for that there are several hits, and we use other terms like "gets credit" elsewhere I believe. And in [[Lab and culture reports]]... | ** If we will have such a rule at all, could it be one that applies to infections in general and would therefore live in [[Template: ICD10 Guideline Infection]]. Also, we would want to make sure that "attribution" as a concept doesn't get muddled - if we search for that there are several hits, and we use other terms like "gets credit" elsewhere I believe. And in [[Lab and culture reports]]... |
Revision as of 14:41, 2019 November 3
Broken out from Resistance to antimicrobials, methicillin (anti-staph penicillins)
Does anyone think making this one rule for all will be a problem? |
|