Check pre acute consistent: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Ttenbergen (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
Ttenbergen (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Data Integrity Check | {{Data Integrity Check | ||
| DIC_summary = | | DIC_summary = consistency of [[Pre acute living situation field]], [[Dispo]], [[Postal Code]] and [[Previous Location]] | ||
| DIC_related_concepts = | | DIC_related_concepts = [[Pre acute living situation field]], [[Dispo]], [[Postal Code)]], [[Previous_Location_field]] | ||
| DIC_firmness = | | DIC_firmness = soft check | ||
| DIC_timing = | | DIC_timing = complete | ||
| DIC_app = CCMDB.mdb | | DIC_app = CCMDB.mdb | ||
| DIC_coding = query '''check pre acute consistent''' | | DIC_coding = query '''check pre acute consistent''' | ||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
}} | }} | ||
The collector will receive an escapable warning if: | |||
* | |||
{{Discuss | who=Tina | question= need analyze further. }} | |||
=== Background === | |||
Julie found cases where the [[pre acute living situation]] for direct admits are not consistent with [[Previous Location]] and/or [[Dispo]]. We want the DC to be aware that the [[pre acute living situation]] has a relationship with the [[Previous Location]] or [[Dispo]]specifically for [[PCH]] cases. | |||
Examples: | |||
* [[pre acute living situation]] = assisted living; [[Previous Location]] = Winnipeg PCH | |||
* [[pre acute living situation]] = supportive home; [[Previous Location]] = St Amant | |||
I rely on the combination of [[pre acute living situation]], [[Previous Location]], [[Postal Code)]] and [[Dispo]] fields '''to identified new or already PCH residents''' prior to admission. Data collectors must understand that '''[[Assisted Living]] and [[Supportive Housing]] are not [[PCH]] and must be entered as simply HOME''' as confirmed by Dr Roberts . | |||
== Related articles == | |||
{{Related Articles}} | |||
[[Category: Admit/Discharge]] | |||
[[Category: Registry Data]] | |||
[[Category: Pre-acute living situation]] |
Revision as of 21:08, 2018 October 15
Data Integrity Checks | |
Summary: | consistency of Pre acute living situation field, Dispo, Postal Code and Previous Location |
Related: | [[Pre acute living situation field, Dispo, Postal Code), Previous_Location_field]] |
Firmness: | soft check |
Timing: | complete |
App: | CCMDB.mdb |
Coding: | query check pre acute consistent |
Uses L Problem table: | not relevant for this app |
Status: | needs review |
Implementation Date: | |
Backlogged: | true |
The collector will receive an escapable warning if:
Background
Julie found cases where the pre acute living situation for direct admits are not consistent with Previous Location and/or Dispo. We want the DC to be aware that the pre acute living situation has a relationship with the Previous Location or Dispospecifically for PCH cases.
Examples:
- pre acute living situation = assisted living; Previous Location = Winnipeg PCH
- pre acute living situation = supportive home; Previous Location = St Amant
I rely on the combination of pre acute living situation, Previous Location, Postal Code) and Dispo fields to identified new or already PCH residents prior to admission. Data collectors must understand that Assisted Living and Supportive Housing are not PCH and must be entered as simply HOME as confirmed by Dr Roberts .
Related articles
Related articles: |