DC Treatment: Difference between revisions

From CCMDB Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
mNo edit summary
Line 7: Line 7:
* '''removed''' field from sending
* '''removed''' field from sending
* '''removed''' field from ccmdb_data
* '''removed''' field from ccmdb_data
* once we have removed the weird data, change the size of this field to 2 from 50
* remove field from CFE data - if that's what Julie agrees to
* remove field from CFE data - if that's what Julie agrees to
* delete wiki page when done
* delete wiki page when done
}}
}}


{{DJ |
{{Discuss | who = Pagasa | question =
* Three of these contain weird values; do we care?
* Pagasa, as confirmed by Julie please set the values in the DC field for the following entries to blank and update here when done.
  D_ID SentDtTm R_dc_treat
  D_ID SentDtTm R_dc_treat
  STB_ACCU-30009 2016-Sep-16 06:35 c
  STB_ACCU-30009 2016-Sep-16 06:35 c
  HSC_SICa-767 2016-Aug-03 07:51 s
  HSC_SICa-767 2016-Aug-03 07:51 s
  STB_CCU-29365 2015-Nov-04 10:14 Leslie
  STB_CCU-29365 2015-Nov-04 10:14 Leslie
}}
{{DJ |
* Do we want to keep this field in CFE or transfer the "DC" values into the new spot, and what would that be?  
* Do we want to keep this field in CFE or transfer the "DC" values into the new spot, and what would that be?  
** delete the weird values. maybe make a new table L_DC and another for L_FILTER  and move to TMS legacy. --[[User:JMojica|JMojica]] 17:20, 2022 August 12 (CDT)}}
** maybe make a new table L_DC and another for L_FILTER  and move to TMS legacy. --[[User:JMojica|JMojica]] 17:20, 2022 August 12 (CDT)
** I meant putting the value into however we encode the concept now. Is that palliative? Not really, I guess. If it's not consistent with what we do now then we should keep it as is. I will change it to a much smaller field (currently 50 char, will become 2), at which point keeping it in centralized will be fine. Or do you know of a spot where we collect the new concept now? [[User:Ttenbergen|Ttenbergen]] 11:31, 2022 August 23 (CDT)
}}


{{LegacyContent
{{LegacyContent

Revision as of 11:31, 2022 August 23

_after

  • confirmed this is really unused
  • removed field from sending
  • removed field from ccmdb_data
  • once we have removed the weird data, change the size of this field to 2 from 50
  • remove field from CFE data - if that's what Julie agrees to
  • delete wiki page when done
  • added:
  • action: 2022-08-09
  • Cargo


  • Categories
  • Pagasa, as confirmed by Julie please set the values in the DC field for the following entries to blank and update here when done.
D_ID	SentDtTm	R_dc_treat
STB_ACCU-30009	2016-Sep-16 06:35	c
HSC_SICa-767	2016-Aug-03 07:51	s
STB_CCU-29365	2015-Nov-04 10:14	Leslie
  • SMW


  • Cargo


  • Categories


  • Do we want to keep this field in CFE or transfer the "DC" values into the new spot, and what would that be?
    • maybe make a new table L_DC and another for L_FILTER and move to TMS legacy. --JMojica 17:20, 2022 August 12 (CDT)
    • I meant putting the value into however we encode the concept now. Is that palliative? Not really, I guess. If it's not consistent with what we do now then we should keep it as is. I will change it to a much smaller field (currently 50 char, will become 2), at which point keeping it in centralized will be fine. Or do you know of a spot where we collect the new concept now? Ttenbergen 11:31, 2022 August 23 (CDT)
  • SMW


  • Cargo


  • Categories

Legacy Content

This page contains Legacy Content.
  • Explanation: stopped collection in Medicine
  • Successor: various tmp and dx codes relating to palliative care and End-of-life related data

Click Expand to show legacy content.

 
 
 
 

Legacy Content

This page contains Legacy Content.
  • Explanation: This is a legacy data field, its DataElementEndDate is in the past.
  • Successor: No successor was entered

Click Expand to show legacy content.

Data Element (edit)
Field Name: R_dc_treat
CCMDB Label: not stated
CCMDB tab: not stated
Table: L_Log table
Data type: string
Length: 50
Program: CC
Created/Raw: Raw
Start Date: 1988-07-11
End Date: 2022-05-10
Sort Index: 12

"DC" for critical care patients if life-support treatment is terminated, blank for all others.

  • SMW

Legacy implementation right in the table

  • Cargo


  • Categories
  • Forms


This field was also collected in Medicine until 2013-07-04. Collection stopped because the distinction is not clear enough for coding on a medicine ward.

Defined as terminal withdrawal with expectation of death of:

  • invasive mechanical ventilation (ET tube or trach)
  • vasopressors or inotropes
  • ECMO, VV, ECMO, VA
  • VAD (Ventricular assistive device)

See Also

See: Comfort Care

Log

  • 2022-05-10 removed from collection screen

Related articles

Related articles: