BedHeldEnd DtTm
Projects | |
Active?: | planned |
Program: | CC and Med |
Requestor: | ??? |
Collection start: | 2023-01-01 |
Collection end: |
Collection Instructions
- Project :BedHeldEnd DtTm
- Items: AMA or Procedure
- Date (field E): Discharge date as per ADT (ie when the bed was released)
- Time (field M): Discharge time as per ADT (ie when the bed was released)
Background
As discussed at JALT ...
The frequency of people leaving AMA (esp from ward) is not low. And, per Lisa, most of these are without notice. Thus it is not a trivial issue that there is a nontrivial difference between when the patient actually stops being under care vs. when the bed is released for reassignment.
Our [previous instructions were to note in the Dispo DtTm field when the person left AMA, or was noted to be gone and assumed AMA. If a bed is "held" and the patient indeed returns, goes back into that bed without being readmitted (because the bed was held), then this isn't to be considered to be an AMA. This follows the same kind of reasoning as Visits to temporary locations. This meant we had no way to report bed times lost to AMA.
We then realized that this issue is the same for bed times lost to beds held when a patient is sent to another hospital for a procedure, expecting to return (so the bed from the sending site is held) but then does not return.
These 2 situations are easy for the DCs to identify and they always do so anyway, so we decided to track this to allow us to report on this more meaningfully.
Still need to integrate this:
|
Collection parameters
- Collected only at STB CICU
- Start Date: 2023-01-01
- End Date: planned as continuous collection without an end date
Data Use
|
Data Integrity Checks (automatic list)
App | Status | |
---|---|---|
Query check tmp BedHeld | CCMDB.accdb | implemented |
SAS Program
The SAS program to read the data can be found in X:\Julie\SAS_CFE\CFE_macros\CFE_ATBloodType.sas