ClientGUID field: Difference between revisions

Line 15:

=== Background ===

Many patients don't have MB [[PHIN]]s so we generate [[PseudoPHIN]]s. EPR solves this by using a field ClientGUID, which we get as part of the [[Cognos EPR Report]]. If we set up the infrastructure to actually put this into patient records then we might be able to step away from the PseudoPhin process, and should have many fewer link errors.

* The Client GUID is not visible in EPR

=== Concerns ===

==== Data that is entered without a ClientGUID ====

* Could be a problem:

** Manual entry if we miss an admission and this is identified later past the 28 day of data in COGNOS

~~{{DL |~~

* Do you know if the ClientGUID is visible in EPR anywhere? It is usually a long number, like 4000012345678912 at HSC. There are shorter ones and some start with a different number. If these were actually visible in EPR then the question of whether we ever enter a record otherwise would go away, as we would be ale to just enter them explicitly as needed[[User:Ttenbergen|Ttenbergen]] 15:32, 2022 August 4 (CDT)

*I would need a specific example of Client GUID and the patient to look in EPR [[User:Lkaita|Lisa Kaita]] 12:26, 2022 August 24 (CDT)

** The second field in your L_Log table is now being populated with these, so sort it z-to-a and you should see examples of ClientGUIDs. [[User:Ttenbergen|Ttenbergen]] 15:01, 2022 August 24 (CDT)

*I looked at a few and the ClientGUID does not appear to be on the EPR, the only long # in EPR other than MRN is the Visit ID # [[User:Lkaita|Lisa Kaita]] 14:04, 2022 August 25 (CDT)

** Do you mean you can see the [[ClientVisitGUID field]] in EPR? [[User:Ttenbergen|Ttenbergen]] 15:48, 2022 August 25 (CDT)

*** no I can't see it in EPR [[User:Lkaita|Lisa Kaita]] 08:52, 2022 September 1 (CDT)

**** so what is the "Visit ID #" if it's not the [[ClientVisitGUID field|Client'''Visit'''GUID]]? [[User:Ttenbergen|Ttenbergen]] 10:05, 2022 September 6 (CDT)

** its the same as the Visit Admit Dttm [[User:Lkaita|Lisa Kaita]] 10:31, 2022 September 9 (CDT)

}}

** [[Definition_of_a_Medicine_Laptop_Admission#Excluded_service_admissions_can_lead_to_missed_records]]

* Not a problem:

@@ Line 15: / Line 15: @@
 === Background ===
 Many patients don't have MB [[PHIN]]s so we generate [[PseudoPHIN]]s. EPR solves this by using a field ClientGUID, which we get as part of the [[Cognos EPR Report]]. If we set up the infrastructure to actually put this into patient records then we might be able to step away from the PseudoPhin process, and should have many fewer link errors.
+* The Client GUID is not visible in EPR
 === Concerns ===
 ==== Data that is entered without a ClientGUID ====
 * Could be a problem:
 ** Manual entry if we miss an admission and this is identified later past the 28 day of data in COGNOS
-{{DL |
-* Do you know if the ClientGUID is visible in EPR anywhere? It is usually a long number, like  4000012345678912 at HSC. There are shorter ones and some start with a different number. If these were actually visible in EPR then the question of whether we ever enter a record otherwise would go away, as we would be ale to just enter them explicitly as needed[[User:Ttenbergen|Ttenbergen]] 15:32, 2022 August 4 (CDT)
-*I would need a specific example of Client GUID and the patient to look in EPR [[User:Lkaita|Lisa Kaita]] 12:26, 2022 August 24 (CDT)
-** The second field in your L_Log table is now being populated with these, so sort it z-to-a and you should see examples of ClientGUIDs. [[User:Ttenbergen|Ttenbergen]] 15:01, 2022 August 24 (CDT)
-*I looked at a few and the ClientGUID does not appear to be on the EPR, the only long # in EPR other than MRN is the Visit ID # [[User:Lkaita|Lisa Kaita]] 14:04, 2022 August 25 (CDT)
-** Do you mean you can see the [[ClientVisitGUID field]] in EPR? [[User:Ttenbergen|Ttenbergen]] 15:48, 2022 August 25 (CDT)
-*** no I can't see it in EPR [[User:Lkaita|Lisa Kaita]] 08:52, 2022 September 1 (CDT)
-**** so what is the "Visit ID #" if it's not the [[ClientVisitGUID field|Client'''Visit'''GUID]]? [[User:Ttenbergen|Ttenbergen]] 10:05, 2022 September 6 (CDT)
-** its the same as the Visit Admit Dttm [[User:Lkaita|Lisa Kaita]] 10:31, 2022 September 9 (CDT)
-}}
 ** [[Definition_of_a_Medicine_Laptop_Admission#Excluded_service_admissions_can_lead_to_missed_records]]
 * Not a problem: