ClientGUID field

Data Element (edit)
Field Name:	ClientGUID
CCMDB Label:	not stated
CCMDB tab:	not stated
Table:	Cognos_import3 table
Data type:	string
Length:	16
Program:	Med and CC
Created/Raw:	Raw
Start Date:	1988-07-11
End Date:	2300-01-01
Sort Index:
Data Dependencies(Reports/Indicators/Data Elements):	No results

The unique person identifier from Cognos.

• SMW

Legacy implementation right in the table

• Cargo

• Categories

• Forms

Many patients don't have MB PHINs so we generate PseudoPHINs. I figured EPR must already solve this problem, and they use this field. We now get this as part of the Cognos data dump. If we set up the infrastructure to actually put this into patient records then we might be able to step away from the PseudoPhin process, and should have many fewer link errors.

Do all collectors now add records from Cognos only or do some still do manual entry? Manual entry would break any processes we change to use this. Ttenbergen 09:20, 2022 March 24 (CDT)

• SMW

• Cargo

• Categories

Implementation

This would likely replace Person ID field; Generate Person IDs would still need to be done to enter this into L_Person table.

_ccmdb_data_dev, _ccmdb_dev add this field to L_Log table in CCMDB_data and Centralized_Data add code so it's entered on patient generation add the field to sending review linking and related processes to see what could change to make best use of this

added: 2022-03-24 action: 2022-03-24

• Cargo

• Categories

Do we even still need the L_Person table if we have this field? It contains last updated and death. Since we never got hospital deaths, we probably don't use that field. And I doubt we use the last-updated field - and in any case, it could easily be recreated from data, no need to store it. Unless of course we want to use it so we can streamline the re-checking and re-indexing of data somehow. Ttenbergen 09:28, 2022 March 24 (CDT)

• SMW

• Cargo

• Categories

Data Processing improvements

Having this field should further cut down on Pre-linking checks, or at least on how many problems those find.

Do you still see many errors in the Pre-linking checks now that we get our data from Cognos? Ttenbergen 09:49, 2022 March 24 (CDT)

• SMW

• Cargo

• Categories

Backfilling

I started discussion with DSS that we would like to eventually back-fill this data. So, for any MRN where we don't have a ClientGUID we would ask for it to be provided. Chances are ancient records won't have a ClientGUID; we could fill in our PHIN/PseudoPHIN for those.

Log

• 2022-03-24 - added field to Cognos_import3 table in CCMDB.accdb so the import can still work.

Changing D_IDs

Changing D_IDs