Combined ICD10 codes: Difference between revisions

From CCMDB Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 11: Line 11:
*For some situations the multiple codes need to be '''''linked together''''' (we use the term "combined").  
*For some situations the multiple codes need to be '''''linked together''''' (we use the term "combined").  
*For other situations it's just a matter of ensuring that the multiple codes are all in the diagnosis list -- i.e. they don't need to be combined.
*For other situations it's just a matter of ensuring that the multiple codes are all in the diagnosis list -- i.e. they don't need to be combined.
* There are some Dxs that can only be expressed as combinations, see [[Some specific cases]]
* There are some Dxs that can only be expressed as combinations, see [[#Some specific cases]]


=== Clinical Situation Plus its Cause ===
=== Clinical Situation Plus its Cause ===

Revision as of 17:06, 2018 April 5

To code some diagnoses as part of ICD10 collection, several lines of entries in the Patient viewer tab ICD10 need to be grouped together.

To group diagnoses together, use the same Dx Priority for all of them.


Iatrogenic codes:

Coding instructions

Introduction

  • There are numerous situations in which multiple codes need to be listed in order to accurately reflect what's going on medically.
  • For some situations the multiple codes need to be linked together (we use the term "combined").
  • For other situations it's just a matter of ensuring that the multiple codes are all in the diagnosis list -- i.e. they don't need to be combined.
  • There are some Dxs that can only be expressed as combinations, see #Some specific cases

Clinical Situation Plus its Cause

  • Many ICD10 codes are for manifestations of disease, not a specific disorder per se.
  • In their Wiki articles it will say something like "also code cause if known" e.g: Hematemesis
  • If the cause is an infection, the Wiki article will instruct to "also code infection source", e.g: Shock, septic
  • In general, when you have a manifestation and a cause, the two codes should be combined.
    • For example, in Septic Shock that has led to liver failure, the two should be coded with the same priority.

Primary Admit Diagnosis in Combined Codes

See Primary Admit Diagnosis

Dxs that can only be expressed as combinations

Some entities can only be coded with a combination of two codes.

Examples:

Questions and concerns

Template:DiscussionTemplate:ICD10

  • There is a risk of data collectors putting in a code like seizures NOS and then not combining it with the cause. Will this be a problem for our database to lose the cause of some diagnosis?

Template:DiscussionTemplate:ICD10

  • When coding septic shock, should we put in the organ damage issues connected to the septic shock code with the same priority number? ie. liver problems, renal problems, thrombocytopenia, etc. related to the shock? If we don't do this we don't really have a shock liver code so with the current list there is nothing to show this link. Just need to clarify this. It is tricky because there can be multiple causes of organ damage even in the same patient.--LKolesar 13:26, 2018 February 8 (CST)
    • Yes you should. See Combined ICD10 codes. Mind you it was kind of hidden, so I used your example to emphasize. However, I guess sometimes one of the codes will be an admit and the other an acquired. Not sure how we will deal with that one. Still needs to be addressed. Ttenbergen 22:03, 2018 March 20 (CDT)

Some specific cases

Template:Combined dx metastasis primary Template:Trauma w mechanism Template:ICD10 infection Template:Combined dx AB resistance Template:ICD10 Symptoms not needed when cause known

Other co-codes

  • In addition to the combined coding situations listed above, you can combine codes when it makes sense to you to do so. The general guideline should be that codes be combined (instead of just both listed in the diagnosis list) when they are strongly related to each other.
  • Use your judgement. Either listing them separately, or combined ensures that they're all there.

Transition notes

Yes, this different from how we used to use dx priorities where they had to be unique.

Data

The records are combined by same L_ICD10.Dx Priority.