Definition of a Critical Care Laptop Admission: Difference between revisions

From CCMDB Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
mNo edit summary
No edit summary
 
(41 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
The definition of an "ICU patient" for the Regional ICU Database is:
This page defines what would be a profile (aka "record") in the Critical Care portion of the database (see also [[Definition of a Medicine Laptop Admission]]).  
*A patient admitted under Critical Care service, regardless of their physical location, even if it is a [[Boarding Loc]] such as PACU or ER. If patient doesn't meet this definition then we don't collect data and enter into the ICU database.  


A Critical Care profile constitutes all care under a given ICU service team. Thus when a patient changes service, a new record is begun. If a patient moves locations, but remains on the same ICU service, no new record is begun.


** except [[STB_CICU Admissions start at Arrive_DtTm]]


{{DA |
* As per [[Task_Team_Meeting_-_Rolling_Agenda_and_Minutes_2020#ICU_Database_Task_Group_Meeting_.E2.80.93_November_18.2C_2020]] I was supposed to fix this to state that for pts in PACU, they are to be included if critical care, but not if surgery. Not sure how to integrate above... [[User:Ttenbergen|Ttenbergen]] 17:01, 2020 November 18 (CST)
}}


{{DiscussTask |
It is relevant for [[Using Cognos2 to keep track of patients]] general data use.  
Thanks to Steph for making me aware that [[Bed borrow]] might tell to exclude some patients who would otherwise be Critical Care admissions: if patients are brought into ICUs for procedures only, we don't collect them. Emailed her back to find out if a pt like that would still show up in the Cognos lists for either unit or service start. [[User:Ttenbergen|Ttenbergen]] 16:23, 2020 December 7 (CST)
* In email response Steph doubted these procedure pts would show up in the Cognos reports because the service does not change to ICU for them, and that would be right. If everyone else agrees then we should just add a statement to this page to explicitly exclude them, and link to [[Bed borrow]] for more details. [[User:Ttenbergen|Ttenbergen]] 23:19, 2020 December 7 (CST)
}}


{{DiscussTask |
* '''The GENERAL RULE''' is that a patient becomes a Critical Care Laptop patient at the date/time that the ICU team takes over being their primary care team -- regardless of their physical location, even if it is a [[Boarding Loc]] such as ED or PACU. Thus, this relates to the first relevant [[Service tmp entry]].
* This definition does not deal with surgical / SICU pts who may well not be under the critical service. If they are in Emerg or [[ECIP]] or PACU, how would a pt be identified as an SICU pt?
**We define ''the ICU takes over being their primary care team'' as occurring when there is clear indication (usually a progress note) to this effect.  That note may be by the ward team or by the ICU team.
}}
*Each critical care service that a patient is admitted to will have a separate profile. For HSC, this means [[HSC_MICU]], [[HSC_SICU]], and [[HSC_IICU]] admissions will all be collected as separate profiles. The same rule applies to St Boniface for ICMS, ACCU, and ICCS admissions. Grace only has one critical care service so this is not relevant there.
**The profiles are by service, not by location. So for example, if an MICU patient is transferred to SICU for bed management reasons and remains under the MICU service, this remains one profile and is not divided into two. Conversely, if an MICU patient is accepted by the SICU service and transfers to SICU, this stay would be separated into two profiles by service.
* There are a small number of tricky situations (not really exceptions) for this general rule:
*# [[HSC_SICU]]: As SICU patients remain under the primary care of the surgical service (technically, the SICU team is a consulting service even though much of the daily ICU care is guided by the SICU team), the general rule is modified such that the patient becomes a Critical Care Laptop patient at the date/time that the SICU team agrees to take over care of the patient (in SICU or equivalent SICU boarding location such as ER or PACU).  This is thus a "partial exception" in that the only difference with the general rule is that the ICU team isn't officially the primary care team of SICU patients. 
*# Some Cardiac Surgery patients ([[STB CICU]]) are tricky in regards to this, even though as per the general rule, the patient becomes a Critical Care laptop patient at the date/time when he/she transitions to be under the care of the CICU team. The tricky issue here is related to the fact that there are cardiac surgeons who are CICU attendings, cardiac surgery ward attendings, and operating surgeons guiding care in PACU.  Thus it can sometimes be tricky to figure out ''which'' cardiac surgery service is caring for the patient before they actually arrive in [[STB CICU]] (or equivalent boarding location).
*# Pts in ICU for procedures only who are never actually under the ICU service: These patients are, by definition, not ICU patients, and clearly DO fall under the general rule.  But they may be tricky if it is not recognized that they were never under the care of the ICU team.


== Exceptions ==
=== From Code Blue / [[Respiratory arrest]] ===
* [[STB_CICU Admissions start at Arrive_DtTm]]
* The ICU team '''does not take over main/overall care of a patient DURING a code on the ward'''. When the ICU team runs a ward code, they are just performing a procedure (ACLS) for the ward team. We only consider the ICU team as taking over care IF once the patient has survived the code (or possibly in between arrests), the ICU team has agreed to do so.  So, this is not automatic. The main way this will be noted is that the Medicine ward resident will almost certainly write a note indicating this.


== Reporting ==
== Dates of service vs location starts ==
{{Discuss | who = Julie |
See [[Admit DtTm]] for how the starting time of a record is encoded.
* We need to ensure consistency with pages like [[Length of Stay (ICU Report)]] which rely on this definition. }}
 
==ICU Service Attendings and Admissions==
There is an "A', "B" and "C or outreach physician" The outreach physician is responsible for rounding on JJ3 patients and new consults are seen by A, B, C or housestaff depending on how busy the unit is. As per Bojan for those that are '''ECIP''': If the patient was to be admitted to initial site ICU but there was a lack of bed capacity then I would consider that an admission that then was transferred however if there was no intention to admit to site unit because patient needed services at another site ICU then I would not consider them an admit
 
== End of a database profile ==
=== Bed holds ===
To see when a profile should continue vs new profile, see [[Bed holds]].  


== Related Articles ==
== Related Articles ==
{{Related Articles}}
{{Related Articles}}
{{LegacyContent
|explanation=xxx
|successor=xxx
|content=  }}


[[Category: Admit/Discharge]]
[[Category: Admit/Discharge]]

Latest revision as of 10:07, 2023 November 20

This page defines what would be a profile (aka "record") in the Critical Care portion of the database (see also Definition of a Medicine Laptop Admission).

A Critical Care profile constitutes all care under a given ICU service team. Thus when a patient changes service, a new record is begun. If a patient moves locations, but remains on the same ICU service, no new record is begun.


It is relevant for Using Cognos2 to keep track of patients general data use.

  • The GENERAL RULE is that a patient becomes a Critical Care Laptop patient at the date/time that the ICU team takes over being their primary care team -- regardless of their physical location, even if it is a Boarding Loc such as ED or PACU. Thus, this relates to the first relevant Service tmp entry.
    • We define the ICU takes over being their primary care team as occurring when there is clear indication (usually a progress note) to this effect. That note may be by the ward team or by the ICU team.
  • Each critical care service that a patient is admitted to will have a separate profile. For HSC, this means HSC_MICU, HSC_SICU, and HSC_IICU admissions will all be collected as separate profiles. The same rule applies to St Boniface for ICMS, ACCU, and ICCS admissions. Grace only has one critical care service so this is not relevant there.
    • The profiles are by service, not by location. So for example, if an MICU patient is transferred to SICU for bed management reasons and remains under the MICU service, this remains one profile and is not divided into two. Conversely, if an MICU patient is accepted by the SICU service and transfers to SICU, this stay would be separated into two profiles by service.
  • There are a small number of tricky situations (not really exceptions) for this general rule:
    1. HSC_SICU: As SICU patients remain under the primary care of the surgical service (technically, the SICU team is a consulting service even though much of the daily ICU care is guided by the SICU team), the general rule is modified such that the patient becomes a Critical Care Laptop patient at the date/time that the SICU team agrees to take over care of the patient (in SICU or equivalent SICU boarding location such as ER or PACU). This is thus a "partial exception" in that the only difference with the general rule is that the ICU team isn't officially the primary care team of SICU patients.
    2. Some Cardiac Surgery patients (STB CICU) are tricky in regards to this, even though as per the general rule, the patient becomes a Critical Care laptop patient at the date/time when he/she transitions to be under the care of the CICU team. The tricky issue here is related to the fact that there are cardiac surgeons who are CICU attendings, cardiac surgery ward attendings, and operating surgeons guiding care in PACU. Thus it can sometimes be tricky to figure out which cardiac surgery service is caring for the patient before they actually arrive in STB CICU (or equivalent boarding location).
    3. Pts in ICU for procedures only who are never actually under the ICU service: These patients are, by definition, not ICU patients, and clearly DO fall under the general rule. But they may be tricky if it is not recognized that they were never under the care of the ICU team.

From Code Blue / Respiratory arrest

  • The ICU team does not take over main/overall care of a patient DURING a code on the ward. When the ICU team runs a ward code, they are just performing a procedure (ACLS) for the ward team. We only consider the ICU team as taking over care IF once the patient has survived the code (or possibly in between arrests), the ICU team has agreed to do so. So, this is not automatic. The main way this will be noted is that the Medicine ward resident will almost certainly write a note indicating this.

Dates of service vs location starts

See Admit DtTm for how the starting time of a record is encoded.

ICU Service Attendings and Admissions

There is an "A', "B" and "C or outreach physician" The outreach physician is responsible for rounding on JJ3 patients and new consults are seen by A, B, C or housestaff depending on how busy the unit is. As per Bojan for those that are ECIP: If the patient was to be admitted to initial site ICU but there was a lack of bed capacity then I would consider that an admission that then was transferred however if there was no intention to admit to site unit because patient needed services at another site ICU then I would not consider them an admit

End of a database profile

Bed holds

To see when a profile should continue vs new profile, see Bed holds.

Related Articles

Related articles:

Legacy Content

This page contains Legacy Content.
  • Explanation: xxx
  • Successor: xxx