Query check CCI each count vs LOS: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Ttenbergen (talk | contribs) m →Checks |
Ttenbergen (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
||
Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
We have had some CCI count entries that are so high that they are likely errors. | We have had some CCI count entries that are so high that they are likely errors. | ||
{{CCMDB.accdb cross checks triggering for correct values}} | {{CCMDB.accdb cross checks triggering for correct values}} | ||
== | === CCI codes considered === | ||
{{#ask: [[Has CCI Picklist Code::2.ZZ.13.RA||2.ZZ.13.RE||3.GY.10.VA||3.ID.10.V^||3.IP.10.V^||3.IP.30||3.IP.20||3.IP.40||3.IP.70||3.JM.10.V^||3.JY.20||3.KV.10.VX||3.KX.10.VC||3.IM.10.V^||3.OT.10.VA]] | {{#ask: [[Has CCI Picklist Code::2.ZZ.13.RA||2.ZZ.13.RE||3.GY.10.VA||3.ID.10.V^||3.IP.10.V^||3.IP.30||3.IP.20||3.IP.40||3.IP.70||3.JM.10.V^||3.JY.20||3.KV.10.VX||3.KX.10.VC||3.IM.10.V^||3.OT.10.VA]] | ||
|?Has CCI Picklist Code=Code | |?Has CCI Picklist Code=Code | ||
Line 61: | Line 37: | ||
}} | }} | ||
=== CCI collect count each === | == Checks == | ||
This uses [[Function LOS()]] to calculate the [[LOS]]. | |||
=== [[Template:CCI collect count each|CCI collect count each]] and [[Template:CCI collect each|CCI collect each]] === | |||
These should be checked. | These should be checked. | ||
=== CCI collect count days === | === [[Template:CCI collect count days|CCI collect count days]] === | ||
Implemented by [[query check_CCI_vs_LOS_count_days_component]] and [[query check_CCI_vs_LOS_count_days_picklist]]. | |||
=== CCI collect count units === | === [[Template:CCI collect count units|CCI collect count units]] === | ||
Discussed with Julie that this one is likely uncheckable. [[User:Ttenbergen|Ttenbergen]] 15:47, 2021 September 2 (CDT) | Discussed with Julie that this one is likely uncheckable. [[User:Ttenbergen|Ttenbergen]] 15:47, 2021 September 2 (CDT) | ||
== Log == | == Log == |
Revision as of 15:45, 2024 April 24
Data Integrity Checks | |
Summary: | Confirm that a Category:Labs Imaging count is not unreasonably high |
Related: | Blood gas, venous, Blood gas, arterial, CXR (plain film), Angiogram, aortic (any part of aorta), Angiogram, coronary (diagnostic cardiac catheterization), ECHO (echocardiogram of heart), Cardiac CT or Cardiac CT angiogram (with or without coronary arteries), Cardiac MRI, Cardiac nuclear scan (e.g. MUGA), Angiogram, cerebral (including vertebral arteries), CT of chest with PE protocol (CT angiogram of pulmonary vessels), Angiogram, artery NOS (except specifically coded), Angiogram, vein, Angiogram, pulmonary artery (pulmonary arteriogram), AXR (abdominal plain X-ray), LOS |
Firmness: | soft check |
Timing: | complete |
App: | CCMDB.accdb |
Coding: | query check_CCI_imaging_count_vs_LOS |
Uses L Problem table: | not relevant for this app |
Status: | needs review |
Implementation Date: | not entered |
Backlogged: | No |
We have had some CCI count entries that are so high that they are likely errors.
CCMDB.accdb cross checks triggering for correct values
If the actual correct data leads to a cross-check error CCMDB.accdb will not allow you to send. In that case, enter a value that is acceptable and then email the Data Processor using the "generate email" button.
CCI codes considered
Checks
This uses Function LOS() to calculate the LOS.
CCI collect count each and CCI collect each
These should be checked.
CCI collect count days
Implemented by query check_CCI_vs_LOS_count_days_component and query check_CCI_vs_LOS_count_days_picklist.
CCI collect count units
Discussed with Julie that this one is likely uncheckable. Ttenbergen 15:47, 2021 September 2 (CDT)
Log
- 2024-04-24 -
- implemented LOS <7 and count >10 (i.e. double digits, because that's a likely fumble finger mistake)
- initially this was supposed to be for CXR, then general imaging, now all sorts of CCI entries
- 2022-02-10 - confirmed that this would not be affected by the change of including a time in the Px Date
- 2022-01-19 - Julie confirmed that we don't need to check this per Boarding Loc - per profile is enough (especially since it's a soft check)