Infections in ICD10
Infections in ICD10 are coded somewhat inconsistently. There are #Diagnoses where the pathogen is implied and #Diagnoses where the pathogen must be coded separately. #Coding Antibiotic Resistance should also be done when there is one.
Diagnoses where the pathogen is implied
Some infections are coded as single codes that imply the pathogen:
Diagnoses where the pathogen must be coded separately
Some infections need to be coded as Combined ICD10 codes of the condition and the pathogen. For example, Pneumonia, bacterial and Streptococcus pneumoniae.
Potential Infections
They can also be coded with diagnoses that can potentially have a pathogen, but don't require one. These are usually disorders that may or may not be infectious in nature.
Which date to use for infections in Acquired Diagnosis / Complication
tangential questions
untreatd positive urine cultures
might be better off in Urine tests, NOS, abnormal or Colonized with organism (not infected) depending how it should be coded.
|
time restrictions around calling things iatrogenic
|
Coding Antibiotic Resistance
Antibiotic resistance is combined-coded, see Antibiotic Resistant Organism for more info.
Lab confirmation of results
Cross Checks
See
- Check Infection requiring pathogen must have pathogen combined code
- Check Infection with implied pathogen must not have a pathogen combined code
- Check Pathogens must have Infection requiring pathogen or Potential Infection
- do we want to go further, e.g. "viral infections must have virus pathogens"?
- Check Antibiotic resistance must have pathogen or Infection with implied pathogen
If we end up with specific pages or sub-headings we should update Template:ICD10 Guideline Infection to link specifically.