Shock, septic: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Ttenbergen (talk | contribs) |
Ttenbergen (talk | contribs) m adding {{Data Integrity Check List}} |
||
Line 39: | Line 39: | ||
== Related CCI Codes == | == Related CCI Codes == | ||
{{Data Integrity Check List}} | |||
== Related Articles == | == Related Articles == | ||
{{Related Articles}} | {{Related Articles}} | ||
{{ICD10 footer}} | {{ICD10 footer}} | ||
{{EndPlaceHolder}} | {{EndPlaceHolder}} |
Revision as of 00:48, 2018 November 18
ICD10 Diagnosis | |
Dx: | Shock, septic |
ICD10 code: | R57.2 |
Pre-ICD10 counterpart: | Septic Shock |
Charlson/ALERT Scale: | none |
APACHE Como Component: | none |
APACHE Acute Component: | 2019-0: Sepsis |
Start Date: | |
Stop Date: | |
External ICD10 Documentation |
This diagnosis is a part of ICD10 collection.
Additional Info
- Even though as of November 2017 ICD-10 has not yet been modified to reflect it, we are using the 2016 consensus definition of sepsis and septic shock (JAMA 315(8):801-10, 2016). These new definitions completely do away with talking about the Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS). In the 2016 definitions we have just 2 subcategories:
- Sepsis is life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to infection -- NOTE this was the 2001 definition of "severe sepsis"
- Septic shock is a subset of sepsis in which profound circulatory, cellular and metabolic abnormalities are associated with a greater risk of mortality than with sepsis alone
- CRITERIA for the SHOCK in Septic Shock:
- Persisting hypotension requiring vasopressors to maintain MAP>65mmHg AND serum lactate>2 mmol/L -- both despite adequate volume resuscitation.
- The CAUSE is proven infection OR presumed infection -- thus positive cultures are not required.
- So, for example, if someone has another obvious cause of shock (e.g. massive hemorrhage) and also has infection, that does not mean it is combined hemorrhagic and septic shock. Basically, septic shock should not be called if there is another obvious cause for shock.
- Also recognize that not all vasodilatory (aka distributive) shock is due to infection. When it is due to infection then use THIS code, when it's not due to infection, then use one of the other appropriate codes, such as: Anaphylactic reaction (anaphylaxis), or Shock, NOS
- If you code this, then do NOT also code Severe sepsis
q Are we to switch now and use this definition for old dx coding (Septic Shock) as written and not our old definition which was more detailed?GHall 08:41, 2018 August 30 (CDT) |
Alternate ICD10s to consider coding instead or in addition
shock codes: |
- Anaphylactic reaction (anaphylaxis) -- includes anaphylactic shock
- Bacteremia AND Fungemia, NOS -- these are laboratory manifestations, and while it's OK to code them if present, if you do so you should also code the clinical manifestation (such as sepsis, etc).
Candidate Combined ICD10 codes
- Also code the causative infection.
Related CCI Codes
Data Integrity Checks (automatic list)
App | Status | |
---|---|---|
Query s tmp QASeptic tmp no dx | CCMDB.accdb | implemented |
Query s tmp QASeptic Dx no tmp ICD10 | CCMDB.accdb | implemented |
Query check ICD10 Inf Infection req Pathogen must have one | CCMDB.accdb | implemented |
Query Check Inf Pathogens must have Infection requiring pathogen or Potential Infection | CCMDB.accdb | implemented |
Related Articles
Show all ICD10 Subcategories