Cognos2 Service Starter: Difference between revisions

mNo edit summary
Line 16: Line 16:
## There were concerns about entering a patient who is in ER under one of our services but has not yet either been discharged (old concept [[EMIP]]) or been moved to a unit (regular inpatient). Apparently some people don't enter these until they resolve to either EMIP or in-patient. There really is no reason to wait for this, since data for both would be entered the same: minimal data set now, everything else later.  
## There were concerns about entering a patient who is in ER under one of our services but has not yet either been discharged (old concept [[EMIP]]) or been moved to a unit (regular inpatient). Apparently some people don't enter these until they resolve to either EMIP or in-patient. There really is no reason to wait for this, since data for both would be entered the same: minimal data set now, everything else later.  
{{DiscussTask |  
{{DiscussTask |  
* Mindy pointed out that, when we moved to starting admissions in ER rather than on unit, we decided that TISS data needs to start at ER admission, but I can't remember if we also resolved whether [[APACHE physiological variable collection]] and [[Labs collected list]]/[[CCI Collection]] would start at (service start resp [[Accept DtTm]]) or (unit start resp [[Arrive DtTm]]) now. [[User:Ttenbergen|Ttenbergen]] 13:14, 2020 November 25 (CST)
* Mindy pointed out that, when we moved to starting admissions in ER rather than on unit, we decided that TISS data needs to start at ER admission, but I can't remember if we also resolved whether [[APACHE physiological variable collection]] and [[CCI Collection]] would start at (service start resp [[Accept DtTm]]) or (unit start resp [[Arrive DtTm]]) now. [[User:Ttenbergen|Ttenbergen]] 13:14, 2020 November 25 (CST)
}}
}}