Admit Diagnosis: Difference between revisions

From CCMDB Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
mNo edit summary
 
(66 intermediate revisions by 8 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
''For other diagnoses, see [[Comorbid Diagnosis]] and [[Acquired Diagnosis / Complication]].''
''For other diagnoses, see [[Comorbid Diagnosis]] and [[Acquired Diagnosis / Complication]].''


'''Admit diagnoses''' are what led to the patient's admission to your unit. The '''most responsible reason''' why the patient was admitted should be given the highest priority on the PDA and in Access. In other words, for the admit diagnosis, the "worst" problem is first. This results in that diagnosis being put into ''"slot one"'' in [[TMSX]].
'''Admit diagnoses''' are what led to the start of the patient's current [[PatientFollow Project]] profile. An Admit Diagnosis is coded by setting the [[Dx_Type]] to "admit". We make special use of the [[Primary Admit Diagnosis]], so make sure you consider the content there.  


== Admit Diagnosis coding restrictions by admit-from location ==  
== Collection Instructions ==
''Note: this is a summary from the defunct article ''! Diagnostic Coding Pointers''. I am cleaning out that article and dispersing its contents to the respective articles. If necessary, please comment here. [[User:Ttenbergen|Ttenbergen]] 16:51, 25 July 2011 (CDT) ''
{{ICD10 Guideline Como vs Admit}}
=== Discussion ===
{{ICD10 Guideline Admit vs Acquired}}
{{discussion}}
I think the following instructions should be eliminated for the following reasons:
* they are too complex; as such people are going to misunderstand them or forget to apply them. Better to stick to the "most important rule" and supplement it with [[General Diagnosis Coding Guidelines]] (these may have to be amended)
* they make special cases out of some diagnoses while leaving others out. For example, why is the reason for a CABG self-evident, but not the reason for an appendectomy?
* some of these contradict the general definition of the admit diagnosis being the "most responsible" diagnosis; when our data is analyzed with that definition in mind then these rules will lead to misrepresentation
* some collectors will stick to these rules even if they get a sense that it will misrepresent the situation; others will code to make sense of the situation as suggested by [[General Diagnosis Coding Guidelines]], yet others will have missed either in all the information, so these rules don't necessarily result in clean data, even if that is the intent.
I think the rules should be deleted, and only the first paragraph of this article should count. If we have such a thing as "surgery wants to know what procedures happen" then mention that in the [[General_Diagnosis_Coding_Guidelines#Consider_what_we_use_the_data_for]] section, e.g. mention Dr Kumar's interest in infections and to code them preferentially even if something more urgent is present (if that's what we want to to) but keep it general.


* What are your thoughts? [[User:Ttenbergen|Ttenbergen]] 17:05, 25 July 2011 (CDT)
==Data Structure==
 
Admit Diagnoses are drawn from [[S_ICD10 table]] and stored in [[L_ICD10 table]].
=== Operating room ===
==== Non-Trauma====
*PROCEDURE(S) FOLLOWED BY THE REASON(S) FOR THE PROCEDURE
*EXCEPTIONS:   
**CABG: SELF-EXPLANATORY NO REASON REQUIRED
**VALVE REPLACEMENT AND CABG: CODE HEART VALVE SURGERY CODE
**CABG SECOND FOLLOWED BY THE REASON OR HEART VALVE PROBLEM
 
==== Trauma====
USE TRAUMA CODES "POST OP" FIRST FOLLOWED BY TRAUMA CODES "NON POST OP" FOR SIGNIFICANT INJURIES NOT OPERATED ON.
* {{discussion}} is that true? What if a less major problem was operated on - wouldn't we want to list the more-major unoperated problem higher? [[User:Ttenbergen|Ttenbergen]] 13:58, 27 July 2011 (CDT)
 
=== Emergency Room===
==== Non-Trauma====
MOST RESPONSIBLE DIAGNOSIS FIRST FOLLOWED BY THE SECOND MOST COMPROMISING PROBLEM
==== Trauma==== 
MOST SIGNIFICANT PRIMARY INJURY FIRST FOLLOWED BY THE SECOND MOST COMPROMISING PROBLEM
* {{discussion}} is that true? Wouldn't we code a "shock" before a broken leg? [[User:Ttenbergen|Ttenbergen]] 13:56, 27 July 2011 (CDT)


==== Angio Lab====
== Legacy Information ==
EMERGENCY ROOM TO ANGIO-LAB FROM ER TO WARD OR UNIT:  LIST PRIMARY PROCEDURE FIRST:ANGIOGRAM FOLLOWED BY ANGIOPLASTY AND THEN STENT IF DONE. FOLLOWED BY PROBLEM OR REASON FOR THE ANGIOGRAM (POSTINFARCT ANGINA/CHF,ETC) FOLLOWED BY REASON (TYPE OF MI) FOLLOWED BY THROMBOLYTICS IF APPLICABLE. EXCEPTION:  IF CARDIOGENIC SHOCK OR CARDIAC ARREST IN ER OR ANGIO LAB LIST AS #1 REASON FOR ADMISSION
{{Collapsable
| always= Maximum Number of Admit Diagnoses
| full=
Until we started to use [[Centralized data.mdb]] we were limited to 6 admit diagnoses.
For some time [[CCMDB.accdb]] had been able to record any number of admit diagnoses. However, only the '''six (6)''' with the highest priority were appended to [[TMSX]]. }}


=== Recovery Room===
{{Data Integrity Check List}}
LIST REASON FOR TRANSFER '''from''' RECOVER ROOM FOLLOWED BY SIGNIFICANT COMPLICATIONS INTRA-OP FOLLOWED BY SURGICAL PROCEDURE AND THEN THE REASON FOR THE SURGERY (EX.: #1) BPCONTROL #2) PAIN CONTROL POST-OP #3) WITNESSED (INTRA-OPERATIVE) CARDIAC ARREST #4) BOWEL RESECTION #5) BOWEL CA)


=== Ward===
===Related articles ===
PRIMARY REASON TO UNIT  FOLLOWED BY SECOND MOST SIGNIFICANT REASON TO UNIT AND THEN RECENT SURGERY (WITHIN 4 DAYS OR SIGNIFICANT TO REASON FOR ADMISSION) SHOULD BE IDENTIFIED LAST.
{{Related Articles}}


== Maximum Number of Admit Diagnoses==
The PDA and the [[CCMDB.mdb]] can record any number of admit diagnoses. However, only the '''six (6)''' with the highest priority will be appended to [[TMSX]]. So, you can track as many diagnoses as you want as you go along, and then delete or re-prioritize to only send the most relevant.
==Data Structure==
Admit Diagnoses are stored in [[L_Dxs]] on the PDA and in the [[CCMDB.mdb]].


[[Category: Diagnosis Coding | * ]]
[[Category:Data Collection Guide]]
[[Category: Data Collection Guide ]]
[[Category:ICD10]]

Latest revision as of 12:06, 2021 April 1

For other diagnoses, see Comorbid Diagnosis and Acquired Diagnosis / Complication.

Admit diagnoses are what led to the start of the patient's current PatientFollow Project profile. An Admit Diagnosis is coded by setting the Dx_Type to "admit". We make special use of the Primary Admit Diagnosis, so make sure you consider the content there.

Collection Instructions

When to use Comorbid Diagnosis vs Admit Diagnosis or neither

When not to code a dx at all

  • Dx was present in the past but that problem is resolved AND does not fit into one of the Category: Past medical history codes
  • Do not code diagnoses that occur during this admission as a comorbid diagnoses. If they have completely resolved then do not code as a comorbid diagnosis until the next admission if applicable. ie. surgical ward had a COVID pneumonia resolved prior to ICU admission. Do not code Past history of Covid-19 infection until the next hospital admission.


Regular comorbid rules exception: Strokes (of any sort, ischemic or hemorrhagic) -- code even resolved strokes with no current sequelae as comorbid diagnoses. If a patient has a past history of stroke, use the regular stroke codes to identify this, even if the patient does not have any residual deficits we will now capture ANY past history of stroke. This is contrary to the usual rules about Comorbid_Diagnosis#When_not_to_code_a_dx_at_all.

Example:   
  • Patient had the left lung removed 7 years ago. Dont code the removal of the lung CCI, but instead code Past history, removal of all or part of lung
  • For someone who had a Cardiac arrest in the past, don't code that as a Comorbid Diagnosis in future admissions, but instead DO code the cause of the cardiac arrest, e.g. an arrythmia, or coronary artery disease, etc.
  • Patient has hypertension for which she takes medications and it is well controlled, but not related to the reasons for admission. Code this, because even if not part of the reason for the current admission, the hypertension IS relevant to this person's chronic medical situation and thus SHOULD be coded, as a Comorbid Diagnosis.
  • Patient had ARDS (noncardiogenic pulmonary edema) a few years ago, and while ARDS is only an acute problem and thus is no longer active, his lungs never fully recovered and he has Respiratory failure (insufficiency), chronic which should be coded as a Comorbid Diagnosis.
  • Chronic and ongoing old conditions should be coded -- as a Comorbid Diagnosis if not part of the reason for this admission.

Some diagnoses can/should be coded as BOTH Admit Diagnosis and Comorbid Diagnosis

If a dx is chronic but also actively treated during this admission, code it as both Admit Diagnosis and Comorbid Diagnosis.

Example:   
  • ex1: Patient who has been, and still is, being treated for active pulmonary TB as an outpatient, and is admitted for an acute MI. Here since on the current admission the TB is still being actively treated, it qualifies as an Admit Diagnosis, as above. But because it has been present from long before this admission, it also qualifies as an "active" Comorbid Diagnosis.
  • ex2: Patient has a past history of CHF and thus it should be coded as a Comorbid Diagnosis. And if the CHF is worse at admission and it is part of the reason for admission, then CHF should also be an Admit Diagnosis.

Recurrent conditions

  • Do not code a recurrent condition that is NOT currently present -- if currently active, include as Admit Diagnosis, otherwise don't code it
Example:   
  • Ex1: Recurrent pneumonia -- in between the infections, there IS NO pneumonia
  • Do code conditions that by nature have intermittent rather than continuous symptoms, but where the underlying condition doesn't go away.
Example:   

Past medical history

Past medical history codes

Past medical history codes should only be captured as Comorbid Diagnoses that represent previous procedures or medical situations. Their names usually follow the pattern "Past history of X" or "X, has one". See Category:Past medical history for a list.

Past medical history codes:

Controlling Dx Type for ICD10 codes

This wiki page talks about which ICD10 codes are allowed to be Comorbid Diagnosis vs. Admit Diagnosis vs. Acquired Diagnosis Dx Type. See Controlling Dx Type for ICD10 codes for a discussion about cross-checks for these.

Legacy - did not use to code Comorbid Diagnoses only discovered during this admission

see how this used to be coded...   
  • As of June 25, 2020, the rules were revised for coding as Comorbid Diagnoses those diagnosed during the current hospitalization (either at admission or thereafter) but which virtually certainly were present pre-admission.

When to code an Admit Diagnosis vs Acquired Diagnosis

  • Distinction between Admit Diagnoses and Acquired Diagnoses relates to the start of a PatientFollow Project profile. An Admit Diagnosis needs to be present at the start of a PatientFollow Project profile. Diagnoses that occur after will be Acquired Diagnoses.
    • There are sometimes subtle issues here, especially for diagnoses that use lab test results.
    • An example is patient comes in to ED with shock presumed due to pneumonia and a lactate=1.7 --> this doesn't meet the requirement for Shock, septic, but by 3 hours later the next lactate checked in the ICU is 2.7, so that threshold for septic shock IS met. Clearly this person was "brewing" septic shock at admission and it seems logical to include that diagnosis as an admit diagnosis. THUS -- in such cases where it seems pretty clear, in retrospect, that a diagnosis was brewing/present at admission but only became fully evident after admission, that diagnosis SHOULD be coded as an Admit Diagnosis IF it becomes fully evident within 6 hours of admission.
Example:   
  • Example1 -- patient's care is taken over by Medicine service while he is still in ED. The admission diagnosis is DKA. He remains on Medicine service in ED (due to lack of ward beds) for 2 days, after which he finally gets up to the Medicine ward and then has a stroke. The stroke is an Acquired Diagnosis, and would still be acquired even if it had occurred during those 2 days in ED.
AND
  • Dx is relevant to this admission in that it is either:
    • (a) an acute or exacerbated condition (as opposed to a chronic, stable condition -- e.g. stable diabetes), OR
    • (b) it is a condition not directly related to the reason(s) for admission, but its treatment is being actively managed -- and by actively we mean that during this admission changes are made to the management.
  • Example2: Patient with TB has been treated for the past 5 (of his 9 expected) months admitted now for acute MI.

Onset not discovery

Code diagnoses are based on the onset of the condition, not necessarily when it was discovered. If a diagnosis is discovered after admission, but likely was present on admission (example, diabetes mellitus) then code it appropriately as a Comorbid Diagnosis or an Admit Diagnosis if it was related to the reason for admission.

Example:   

Patient is admitted with what was thought to be a COPD exacerbation. A few days after admission, they decide the likely cause for this respiratory failure was actually pneumonia, and during these diagnostic tests, discover that the patient has an abdominal aorta aneurysm. In retrospect, it is clear that the pneumonia was the cause of the admission, so the Admit Diagnosis will be pneumonia not COPD exacerbation. The abdominal aorta aneurysm would have had to exist prior to admission, but is not relevant to why the patient is in hospital, and therefore should be coded as a Comorbid Diagnosis.

Diagnosis categories in relation to patients moving around the hospital

  • This section explains how to determine the Dx Type as a patient moves from place to place within a hospital -- i.e. during a single hospitalization. In this section we'll refer to a person who moves from location A (ward) to location B (ICU) to location C (ward), which would constitute three separate patient profiles.
  • Rule#1: Situation where a diagnosis is new to this hospitalization, do not code as a Comorbid Diagnosis. Comorbid diagnoses need to be a chronic, pre-existing disorder that existed prior to the patient’s initial hospitalization, regardless of their physical location throughout this stay.
    • Therefore, any new diagnosis that occur in location A, should not be coded as a comorbid diagnoses for the profiles for location B or location C.
      • if by the time they are transferred to the subsequent location it is resolved and no longer being treated, then it should not show up as any kind of diagnosis for that subsequent record. It will be captured in the data from the initial location.
      • if by the time they are transferred to the subsequent location it is still being dealt with medically, and indeed is part of the reasons they are going to the new location, then it should be listed as an Admit Diagnosis for that subsequent record.
Examples 1 and 2   
  • Example 1: Patient is admitted to location A with pneumonia, then transfers to location B for worsening of the pneumonia, then improves and transfers to location C but remains on antibiotics. This encapsulates three separate database profiles, and pneumonia will be the Admit Diagnosis for all three profiles.
  • Example 2: Patient is admitted to location A with pneumonia, then transfers to location B for worsening of the pneumonia. In location B, the pneumonia resolves and the course of antibiotics is finished. The patient is then transferred to location C for continued rehab for muscle wasting after the critical illness. Pneumonia would then be the admit diagnosis for location A and location B, but will not be captured on location C. The admit diagnosis for location C would be Muscle, wasting/atrophy NOS. Muscle, wasting/atrophy NOS would be captured as an Acquired Diagnosis in location B.
  • Rule#2: The group of diagnoses that represent "past history" (e.g. Past history, loss of limb(s)) are also guided by Rule#1. Comorbid diagnosis must have been a chronic, pre-existing disorder that existed before the hospital admission.
Examples 3 and 4   

Example 3: Patient is admitted to location A for osteomyelitis. During this stay, the patient experiences a cardiac arrest and is transferred to location B. In location B, the leg is amputated as source control and the course of antibiotics is finished. There are no further cardiac arrhythmias and patient is no longer on any anti-arrhythmic medication. They are then transferred to location C.

  • Osteomyelitis would be the admit diagnosis for location A, and an admit diagnosis for location B. It would not be captured as a diagnosis for location C as it is resolved.
  • Cardiac arrest would be the acquired diagnosis for location A, the primary admit diagnosis for location B, and would not be captured as a diagnosis for location C.
  • At no point is Past history, loss of limb(s) captured as it was not a chronic, pre-existing disorder prior to the overall hospital admission.

Example 4: Patient is admitted to location A for osteomyelitis. During this stay, the patient experiences a cardiac arrest and transfers to location B. In location B, the leg is amputated as source control and the course of antibiotics is finished. There are no further cardiac arrhythmias, but the patient remains on anti-arrhythmic medication. They are then transferred to location C.

  • Osteomyelitis would be the admit diagnosis for location A, and an admit diagnosis for location B. It would not be captured as a diagnosis for location C as it is resolved.
  • Cardiac arrest would the acquired diagnosis for location A, the primary admit diagnosis for location B. As the cardiac arrhythmia is still being treated, an admit diagnosis for location C would be cardiac arrhythmia, NOS.
  • At no point is Past history, loss of limb(s) captured as it was not a chronic, pre-existing disorder prior to the overall hospital admission.
  • Rule#3: This is really an observation rather than a "rule". We recognize and accept that the above rules and examples can lead to a single diagnostic event seeming to occur multiple times, while in fact it only occurred once. In Example2, since the pneumonia is listed as an Admit Diagnosis for records A and B and C, it won't be possible to distinguish whether these were a single, ongoing pneumonia versus an original pneumonia plus subsequent separate pneumonia events. The underlying reason for this is the artificial nature of how we collect data -- i.e. when a person goes A-->B-->C this is a single hospital episode but we code it as 3 different records.

Attribution of infections

Attribution of infections provides more info on when to code infections as what Dx Type.

Legacy - prior to PatientFollow Project

expand for pre-PatientFollow Project info   

Prior to PatientFollow Project there was one record per ward/unit stay, so the distinction between Admit Diagnosis and Acquired Diagnosis would have been made on a per-unit basis; since then it is made on a per-PatientFollow Project profile basis.

Controlling Dx Type for ICD10 codes

This wiki page talks about which ICD10 codes are allowed to be Comorbid Diagnosis vs. Admit Diagnosis vs. Acquired Diagnosis Dx Type. See Controlling Dx Type for ICD10 codes for a discussion about cross-checks for these.

Data Structure

Admit Diagnoses are drawn from S_ICD10 table and stored in L_ICD10 table.

Legacy Information

Maximum Number of Admit Diagnoses   

Until we started to use Centralized data.mdb we were limited to 6 admit diagnoses. For some time CCMDB.accdb had been able to record any number of admit diagnoses. However, only the six (6) with the highest priority were appended to TMSX.

Data Integrity Checks (automatic list)

 AppStatus
Check if awaiting code is primary dx then Transfer Ready DtTm must be equal to Arrive DtTmCCMDB.accdbdeclined
Query check ICD10 duplicatesCCMDB.accdbdeclined
Controlling Dx Type for ICD10 codesCCMDB.accdbdeclined
Query check dx primary not exactly oneCCMDB.accdbimplemented
Query check ICD10 dateCCMDB.accdbimplemented
Query check VAP admit must be from ICUCCMDB.accdbretired
Query cardiac arrest throughout admissionCentralized data front end.accdbneeds review

Related articles

Related articles: