Using Cognos2 to keep track of patients: Difference between revisions
Ttenbergen (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
|||
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
* Pam wrote: Alternatively, patients can be searched in EPR from the CSS list. | * Pam wrote: Alternatively, patients can be searched in EPR from the CSS list. | ||
** If the other process is faster there would need to be a good reason for an alternate, slower process. What would that good reason be? [[User:Ttenbergen|Ttenbergen]] 11:03, 2022 January 11 (CST) | ** If the other process is faster there would need to be a good reason for an alternate, slower process. What would that good reason be? [[User:Ttenbergen|Ttenbergen]] 11:03, 2022 January 11 (CST) | ||
* Speed is in collectors' hands; who can guarantee that using one process vs. another is the "fastest" at all sites at all times for all collectors? Perhaps accuracy is being sought by collectors as well as speed? Searching for patients in EPR from the CSS list should be up to individual collector discretion. It is not "wrong" or "alternate" or "deviant" to use this approach and in fact may work better for some sites/programs/collectors. [[User:Ppiche|Pamela Piche]] 12:10, 2022 January 11 (CST) | |||
}} | }} | ||