PatientFollow Project: Difference between revisions
Ttenbergen (talk | contribs) |
Ttenbergen (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 39: | Line 39: | ||
We would essentially take the sum EFTs per program/site and consider them as 100%, and then assign the chart numbers based on that percentage. For example, if a site has 3 collectors that are each a .5EFT, each collector would get 33% of that site's new admissions, so collector A might get charts ending in 00-33, collector B 34-66, and collector C 67-99. | We would essentially take the sum EFTs per program/site and consider them as 100%, and then assign the chart numbers based on that percentage. For example, if a site has 3 collectors that are each a .5EFT, each collector would get 33% of that site's new admissions, so collector A might get charts ending in 00-33, collector B 34-66, and collector C 67-99. | ||
See [[Regional Server]]\ | See [[Regional Server]]\Documents\PatientFollowDistributionEstimator.xltx for an estimate of a split and an explanation of how it is calculated. | ||
{{Collapsable | {{Collapsable | ||