HD (Hemodialysis): Difference between revisions

Line 8:

{{CCI_Therapeutic}}* If the person is being admitted FOR the dialysis (or more properly, for a problem which the dialysis is aiming to fix such as hyperkalemia or a drug overdose treated with dialysis) then it can be an [[Admit Procedure]].

* If the person is being admitted FOR the dialysis (or more properly, for a problem which the dialysis is aiming to fix such as hyperkalemia or a drug overdose treated with dialysis) then it can be an [[Admit Procedure]].

*If not and it's just being done as part of the person's usual care, then it'd be included as an [[Acquired Procedure]]

{{~~discuss~~ | ~~who=all | question=~~

{{discussTask | AJTT

* I need clarification on this one-if a patient is either dialysed in Emerg, or on a different ward, (ie. anytime during the current hospitalization prior to coming to your area), are we to enter this only as an admit CCI?[[User:Mlagadi|Mlagadi]] 10:26, 2019 February 11 (CST)

** Please have a look at [[Admit Procedure]], it should explain whether to code a procedure or not. There is no explicit exception for Dialysis. If the info there does not give you the answer you need, please elaborate. If the info is there, then, would you have looked there? How can we make clearer to look there? Ttenbergen 11:53, 2019 February 13 (CST)

}}

~~{{discuss | who=Julie | question=~~

* We used to have a special procedure for indicating if a renal transplant patient received dialysis post transplant under the tasks. If we are now only coding HD once, it will often be missed if the patient required HD post renal transplant. Do we care about collecting this information? There is the post procedural renal failure code that will be coded in the acquireds, but this does not automatically mean that they received dialysis.

**AG REPLY -- I don't see any special reason to need this info. Unless Julie tells us it's being requested, I think we can do without it.

*** Julie, what are your thoughts on this? Ttenbergen 11:53, 2019 February 13 (CST)}}

*** Julie, what are your thoughts on this? Ttenbergen 11:53, 2019 February 13 (CST)

}}

==Alternate CCIs to consider coding instead or in addition==

@@ Line 8: / Line 8: @@
 {{CCI Collection Mode}}
-{{CCI_Therapeutic}}* If the person is being admitted FOR the dialysis (or more properly, for a problem which the dialysis is aiming to fix such as hyperkalemia or a drug overdose treated with dialysis) then it can be an [[Admit Procedure]].
+{{CCI_Therapeutic}}
+* If the person is being admitted FOR the dialysis (or more properly, for a problem which the dialysis is aiming to fix such as hyperkalemia or a drug overdose treated with dialysis) then it can be an [[Admit Procedure]].
 *If not and it's just being done as part of the person's usual care, then it'd be included as an [[Acquired Procedure]]
-{{discuss | who=all | question=
+{{discussTask | AJTT
-* I need clarification on this one-if a patient is either dialysed in Emerg, or on a different ward, (ie. anytime during the current hospitalization prior to coming to your area), are we to enter this only as an admit CCI?[[User:Mlagadi|Mlagadi]] 10:26, 2019 February 11 (CST)
-** Please have a look at [[Admit Procedure]], it should explain whether to code a procedure or not. There is no explicit exception for Dialysis. If the info there does not give you the answer you need, please elaborate. If the info is there, then, would you have looked there? How can we make clearer to look there? Ttenbergen 11:53, 2019 February 13 (CST)
-}}
-{{discuss | who=Julie | question=
 * We used to have a special procedure for indicating if a renal transplant patient received dialysis post transplant under the tasks. If we are now only coding HD once, it will often be missed if the patient required HD post renal transplant. Do we care about collecting this information? There is the post procedural renal failure code that will be coded in the acquireds, but this does not automatically mean that they received dialysis.
 **AG REPLY -- I don't see any special reason to need this info.  Unless Julie tells us it's being requested, I think we can do without it.
-*** Julie, what are your thoughts on this? Ttenbergen 11:53, 2019 February 13 (CST)}}
+*** Julie, what are your thoughts on this? Ttenbergen 11:53, 2019 February 13 (CST)
+}}
 ==Alternate CCIs to consider coding instead or in addition==