| Projects
|
| Active?:
|
active
|
| Program:
|
CC and Med
|
| Requestor:
|
internal
|
| Collection start:
|
2020-10-15
|
| Collection end:
|
|
This isn't so much a project as a change to Service/Location collection to allow us to collect more than one Service/Location per patient-program-stay. See Change from Service Location to Service, Boarding Loc and Transfer Ready DtTm tmp entry for why we needed to change to this.
Data Collection Instructions
How to enter this
- Use tmp fields:
- Project: Service
- Item: no service entered is added by default to each new patient entered
|
- What date and time are we attaching to this? Accept or Arrive? Surbanski 09:16, 2020 October 16 (CDT)
- It would be better to think of it as "the time the next service started (as per Cognos and also as per EPR)". For the first entry that should be the same as the Accept DtTm, but for any further entries (and those are why we made this), they would NOT be the Accept DtTm. Ttenbergen 09:31, 2020 October 16 (CDT)
- I am not clear here - the first entry should be the start date of the current service (same as Accept_DtTm) and not the time of next service start date? The start of the next service would imply the end of the current (or prior) service. the difference between the next service start and current service start is the LOS of the current service. The last service start date will be subtracted to the DISPO date to get the LOS of the last service. We should make it consistent with the Boarding loc which is based on arrive date. --JMojica 10:03, 2020 October 16 (CDT)
- At the Grace - for those that move from medicine to medicine do we need to add a new Service entry? I'm assuming no because they're still under the medicine service Surbanski 10:17, 2020 October 16 (CDT)
|
|
|
- Just to be clear and as an example for STB Med program a generic entry of STB_Med is entered into the Service/Location field on the Dispo page with a service location entry on the Tmp page?
- Yes. Ttenbergen 09:31, 2020 October 16 (CDT)
|
Loose ends
None of these are show-stoppers, just some notes on future improvements.
|
- This project does might eventually replace ICUotherService; we will still need this item in the event that both the bed and the service are both borrowed. Administration at STB want this data.
|
|
|
- should be able to add something to Cognos Admitter and Patient Viewer Tab Cognos ADT that facilitates entering this; will delay that until we have collected this for a few weeks; if we find these entries to be identical to Cognos data we might not need to enter them at all but instead import them directly, but not until we have checked consistency.
|
|
|
I am trying to enter my first critical care patient at HSC. There are multiple choices (dozens) for HSC critical care, and it is not evident which one I should be choosing. I think that it would be a lot more intuitive if the choices are limited to Critical Care-surgical, Critical Care-medical, and Critical care-Intermediate.Mlagadi 09:01, 2020 October 16 (CDT)
|
data checks
|
|
- add a cross check to make sure this is not left as "no service entered"
|
Data Use
Critical care and Medicine programs want to know this to better understand patient flow and bed utilization.
SAS Program
Background
Related articles